EWG vs IMTM: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 55 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-31
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWG: 2026-05-31, IMTM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWG and IMTM?
iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG, by iShares) holds 55 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14EWG holds 55 · IMTM holds 313
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWG 34%·IMTM 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWG
41 of 55 positions (65.5% of the fund) are not held by IMTM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWG | IMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 20.0% | 36.0% |
| Industrials | 28.6% | 20.2% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 10.0% |
| Materials | 4.8% | 8.4% |
| Communication Services | 6.2% | 2.7% |
| Other Sectors | 19.1% | 17.5% |
| Unclassified | 5.4% | 4.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EWG, 5% of IMTM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWG | +4.7% | +5.7% | +6.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +8.2% | 1.89% |
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWG vs IMTM →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by ENR, ALV and RHM.
 ENRSiemens Energy AG | 7.37% | 2.04% | 2.04% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ALVAllianz SE NPV(REGD)(VINKULIERT) | 8.47% | 1.19% | 1.19% |
 RHMRheinmetall AG | 3.48% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
 DBKDeutsche Bank AG (Registered) | 2.96% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
 EOANE ON SE | 2.40% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
 RWERWE AG | 2.02% | 0.40% | 0.40% |
 HEIHeidelberg Materials AG | 1.49% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
 CBKCommerzbank AG | 1.58% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 BAYNBayer AG (Registered) | 2.10% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Euro | 0.26% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 FREFresenius SE & Co. KGaA | 0.90% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 HOTHochtief AG NPV | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 HAGHensoldt AG | 0.33% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
 CONContinental AG | 0.46% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWG and IMTM overlap?
EWG and IMTM overlap by 7.2% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (EWG holds 55 positions and IMTM holds 313), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWG and IMTM?
The two portfolios are 7.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWG and IMTM?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENR, ALV, RHM, DBK and EOAN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does EWG own that IMTM doesn't?
41 positions (65.5% of EWG) are unique to EWG, led by SIE, SAP and IFX. In the other direction, 299 positions (92.1% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM.