EWG vs IQLT: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 55 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-31
IQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
iShares · 309 holdings · $14.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWG: 2026-05-31, IQLT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWG and IQLT?
iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG, by iShares) holds 55 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT, by iShares) holds 309. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20EWG holds 55 · IQLT holds 309
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWG 25%·IQLT 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWG
35 of 55 positions (74.5% of the fund) are not held by IQLT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWG | IQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 28.6% | 17.3% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 23.4% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 10.8% |
| Health Care | 5.9% | 9.4% |
| Materials | 4.8% | 7.0% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 26.5% |
| Unclassified | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EWG, 5% of IQLT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWG | +4.7% | +5.7% | +6.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +8.2% | 1.89% |
| IQLT | +4.5% | +15.4% | +24.8% | +16.1% | +8.2% | +10.1% | 2.31% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWG vs IQLT →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the overlap, led by ALV, MUV2 and DB1.
8.47% | 2.49% | 2.49% | |
3.45% | 1.14% | 1.14% | |
2.73% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
3.48% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
0.82% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.99% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.48% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.46% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.39% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
| Euro | 0.26% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
0.32% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.61% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.44% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.20% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.23% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.62% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.39% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.31% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.38% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.21% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWG and IQLT overlap?
EWG and IQLT overlap by 6.5% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (EWG holds 55 positions and IQLT holds 309), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWG and IQLT?
The two portfolios are 6.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWG and IQLT?
The largest positions held by both funds are ALV, MUV2, DB1, RHM and HNR1. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the total overlap.
What does EWG own that IQLT doesn't?
35 positions (74.5% of EWG) are unique to EWG, led by SIE, SAP and ENR. In the other direction, 289 positions (92.8% of IQLT) are unique to IQLT.