EWG vs IXJ: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 55 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-31
IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EWG: 2026-05-31, IXJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWG and IXJ?
iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG, by iShares) holds 55 positions; iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ, by iShares) holds 123. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8EWG holds 55 · IXJ holds 123
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWG 6%·IXJ 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWG
47 of 55 positions (93.6% of the fund) are not held by IXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWG | IXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 5.9% | 98.9% |
| Industrials | 28.6% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 6.2% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 18.0% | 0.6% |
| Unclassified | 5.4% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EWG, 0% of IXJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWG | +4.7% | +5.7% | +6.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +8.2% | 1.89% |
| IXJ | +0.7% | +5.9% | +25.5% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +8.5% | 1.41% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWG vs IXJ →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by BAYN, FRE and MRK.
 BAYNBayer AG (Registered) | 2.10% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
|---|---|---|---|
 FREFresenius SE & Co. KGaA | 0.90% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 MRKMerck KGaA | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 SHLSiemens Healthineers AG | 0.69% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 FMEFresenius Medical Care AG | 0.48% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 QIAQiagen N.V. | 0.38% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 SRT3Sartorius AG (Preference) | 0.37% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Euro | 0.26% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWG and IXJ overlap?
EWG and IXJ overlap by 1.6% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (EWG holds 55 positions and IXJ holds 123), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWG and IXJ?
The two portfolios are 1.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWG and IXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are BAYN, FRE, MRK, SHL and FME. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWG own that IXJ doesn't?
47 positions (93.6% of EWG) are unique to EWG, led by SIE, SAP and ALV. In the other direction, 115 positions (98.0% of IXJ) are unique to IXJ.