EWG vs IXUS: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 55 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-31
IXUSiShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
iShares · 4190 holdings · $59.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWG: 2026-05-31, IXUS: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWG and IXUS?
iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG, by iShares) holds 55 positions; iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS, by iShares) holds 4190. They have 55 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 55EWG holds 55 · IXUS holds 4190
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWG 100%·IXUS 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWG
Every position in EWG is also held by IXUS, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWG | IXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 28.6% | 10.9% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 18.7% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 15.2% |
| Communication Services | 6.2% | 3.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.2% | 5.6% |
| Other Sectors | 17.7% | 23.5% |
| Unclassified | 5.4% | 21.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EWG, 22% of IXUS).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWG | +4.7% | +5.7% | +6.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +8.2% | 1.89% |
| IXUS | +3.0% | +16.5% | +27.9% | +19.1% | +9.2% | +9.7% | 2.88% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWG vs IXUS →
Shared Holdings(55)
The top 10 shared positions account for 62% of the overlap, led by SIE, SAP and ALV.
11.97% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
9.49% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
8.47% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
7.37% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
6.21% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
6.22% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
3.45% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
3.48% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
2.73% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
2.66% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
2.96% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
2.75% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
2.40% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
2.02% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
2.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
2.20% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.58% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.49% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.66% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.23% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.13% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.90% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.10% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.95% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.99% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWG and IXUS overlap?
EWG and IXUS overlap by 4.6% of portfolio weight. They share 55 holdings (EWG holds 55 positions and IXUS holds 4190), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWG and IXUS?
The two portfolios are 4.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWG and IXUS?
The largest positions held by both funds are SIE, SAP, ALV, ENR and DTE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 62% of the total overlap.
What does EWG own that IXUS doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in EWG is also held by IXUS. In the other direction, 4135 positions (95.0% of IXUS) are unique to IXUS.