EWG vs XT: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 55 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-31
XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
iShares · 219 holdings · $3.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWG: 2026-05-31, XT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWG and XT?
iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG, by iShares) holds 55 positions; iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT, by iShares) holds 219. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7EWG holds 55 · XT holds 219
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWG 20%·XT 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWG
48 of 55 positions (79.7% of the fund) are not held by XT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWG | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 42.5% |
| Industrials | 28.6% | 9.6% |
| Health Care | 5.9% | 23.2% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 4.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.2% | 7.2% |
| Other Sectors | 18.0% | 11.1% |
| Unclassified | 5.4% | 2.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EWG, 2% of XT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWG | +4.7% | +5.7% | +6.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +8.2% | 1.89% |
| XT | +1.0% | +19.3% | +36.3% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +14.1% | 6.87% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWG vs XT →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by IFX, RHM and ENR.
 IFXInfineon Technologies AG ORD NPV (REGD) | 6.22% | 1.86% | 1.86% |
|---|---|---|---|
 RHMRheinmetall AG NPV | 3.48% | 0.76% | 0.76% |
 ENRSiemens Energy AG | 7.37% | 0.57% | 0.57% |
 RWERWE AG | 2.02% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
 HAGHensoldt AG | 0.33% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| Euro | 0.26% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 SRT3Sartorius AG (Preference) | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWG and XT overlap?
EWG and XT overlap by 3.8% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (EWG holds 55 positions and XT holds 219), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWG and XT?
The two portfolios are 3.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWG and XT?
The largest positions held by both funds are IFX, RHM, ENR, RWE and HAG. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWG own that XT doesn't?
48 positions (79.7% of EWG) are unique to EWG, led by SIE, SAP and ALV. In the other direction, 212 positions (96.0% of XT) are unique to XT.