EWH vs IMTM: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 28 holdings · $1.2B · as of 2026-05-31
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWH: 2026-05-31, IMTM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWH and IMTM?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH, by iShares) holds 28 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313. They have 16 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 16EWH holds 28 · IMTM holds 313
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWH 72%·IMTM 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWH
12 of 28 positions (26.4% of the fund) are not held by IMTM.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWH | IMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 40.7% | 36.0% |
| Industrials | 14.4% | 20.2% |
| Real Estate | 19.3% | 1.5% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 10.0% |
| Utilities | 9.5% | 5.1% |
| Other Sectors | 4.7% | 21.9% |
| Unclassified | 9.7% | 4.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (10% of EWH, 5% of IMTM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWH | +7.8% | +8.6% | +13.1% | +10.7% | +1.2% | +4.3% | 4.56% |
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWH vs IMTM →
Shared Holdings(16)
The top 10 shared positions account for 94% of the overlap, led by 1299, 388 and 2388.
22.85% | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
11.19% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
5.05% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
4.47% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
6.01% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
2.31% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.68% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
2.54% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.60% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
2.68% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
3.03% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.74% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.73% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.58% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Euro | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWH and IMTM overlap?
EWH and IMTM overlap by 2.2% of portfolio weight. They share 16 holdings (EWH holds 28 positions and IMTM holds 313), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWH and IMTM?
The two portfolios are 2.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWH and IMTM?
The largest positions held by both funds are 1299, 388, 2388, 16 and 1. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 94% of the total overlap.
What does EWH own that IMTM doesn't?
12 positions (26.4% of EWH) are unique to EWH, led by 669, 2 and 823. In the other direction, 297 positions (97.0% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM.