EWH vs IPAC: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 28 holdings · $1.2B · as of 2026-05-31
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWH: 2026-05-31, IPAC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWH and IPAC?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH, by iShares) holds 28 positions; iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375. They have 28 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 28EWH holds 28 · IPAC holds 1375
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWH 98%·IPAC 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWH
Every position in EWH is also held by IPAC, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWH | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 40.7% | 20.1% |
| Real Estate | 19.3% | 4.9% |
| Industrials | 14.4% | 15.3% |
| Utilities | 9.5% | 1.3% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 9.0% |
| Other Sectors | 4.7% | 26.6% |
| Unclassified | 9.7% | 22.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (10% of EWH, 22% of IPAC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWH | +7.8% | +8.6% | +13.1% | +10.7% | +1.2% | +4.3% | 4.56% |
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWH vs IPAC →
Shared Holdings(28)
The top 10 shared positions account for 73% of the overlap, led by 1299, 388 and 16.
22.85% | 1.25% | 1.25% | |
11.19% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
4.47% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
6.01% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
4.34% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
5.05% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
4.07% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
3.50% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
3.03% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
2.79% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
2.31% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
2.68% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
2.54% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.60% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.68% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
2.16% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.73% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.67% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.58% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.74% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.63% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.39% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.45% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.36% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.16% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWH and IPAC overlap?
EWH and IPAC overlap by 4.7% of portfolio weight. They share 28 holdings (EWH holds 28 positions and IPAC holds 1375), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWH and IPAC?
The two portfolios are 4.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWH and IPAC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 1299, 388, 16, 1 and 669. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 73% of the total overlap.
What does EWH own that IPAC doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in EWH is also held by IPAC. In the other direction, 1347 positions (94.6% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC.