EWJ vs BBJP: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 179 holdings · $22.4B · as of 2026-05-31
BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
JPMorgan · 179 holdings · $18.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWJ: 2026-05-31, BBJP: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWJ and BBJP?
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ, by iShares) holds 179 positions; JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP, by JPMorgan) holds 179. They have 171 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 91.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially interchangeable, so holding both adds little diversification.
- Overlap by Weight
- 91.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 171EWJ holds 179 · BBJP holds 179
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWJ 98%·BBJP 98%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWJ
8 of 179 positions (1.4% of the fund) are not held by BBJP.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWJ | BBJP |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 23.4% | 25.7% |
| Information Technology | 17.7% | 14.7% |
| Financials | 16.3% | 16.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.2% | 12.3% |
| Communication Services | 7.0% | 6.2% |
| Other Sectors | 16.1% | 17.4% |
| Unclassified | 6.5% | 6.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWJ, 6% of BBJP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWJ | +4.1% | +20.7% | +31.9% | +19.3% | +10.0% | +9.3% | 3.68% |
| BBJP | +4.0% | +18.6% | +30.1% | +19.0% | +10.0% | — | 4.52% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWJ vs BBJP →
Shared Holdings(171)
The top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the overlap, led by 8306, 7203 and 6501.
4.05% | 3.91% | 3.91% | |
3.43% | 4.24% | 3.43% | |
2.84% | 2.76% | 2.76% | |
2.56% | 2.60% | 2.56% | |
2.87% | 2.51% | 2.51% | |
3.34% | 2.47% | 2.47% | |
2.39% | 2.48% | 2.39% | |
2.54% | 2.30% | 2.30% | |
2.14% | 2.04% | 2.04% | |
1.95% | 2.27% | 1.95% | |
1.89% | 1.67% | 1.67% | |
1.87% | 1.66% | 1.66% | |
1.57% | 1.86% | 1.57% | |
1.57% | 1.66% | 1.57% | |
1.56% | 1.69% | 1.56% | |
1.48% | 1.58% | 1.48% | |
1.45% | 1.93% | 1.45% | |
1.37% | 1.67% | 1.37% | |
1.80% | 1.25% | 1.25% | |
2.01% | 1.15% | 1.15% | |
1.10% | 1.22% | 1.10% | |
1.05% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
0.97% | 1.01% | 0.97% | |
0.95% | 1.10% | 0.95% | |
0.96% | 0.91% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWJ and BBJP overlap?
EWJ and BBJP overlap by 91.1% of portfolio weight. They share 171 holdings (EWJ holds 179 positions and BBJP holds 179), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWJ and BBJP?
The two portfolios are 91.1% identical by weight. Owning both is largely redundant: they are close to the same portfolio, so a second position mostly duplicates the first.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWJ and BBJP?
The largest positions held by both funds are 8306, 7203, 6501, 8316 and 8035. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the total overlap.
What does EWJ own that BBJP doesn't?
8 positions (1.4% of EWJ) are unique to EWJ, led by 6361, JAPANESE YEN and 5016. In the other direction, 8 positions (0.9% of BBJP) are unique to BBJP.