EWJ vs LIT: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 179 holdings · $22.4B · as of 2026-05-31
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWJ: 2026-05-31, LIT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWJ and LIT?
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ, by iShares) holds 179 positions; Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41. They have 2 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 2EWJ holds 179 · LIT holds 41
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWJ 2%·LIT 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWJ
177 of 179 positions (97.3% of the fund) are not held by LIT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWJ | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 3.3% | 41.6% |
| Industrials | 23.4% | 8.5% |
| Information Technology | 17.7% | 13.8% |
| Financials | 16.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.2% | 9.6% |
| Other Sectors | 19.8% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 6.5% | 26.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWJ, 26% of LIT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWJ | +4.1% | +20.7% | +31.9% | +19.3% | +10.0% | +9.3% | 3.68% |
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWJ vs LIT →
Shared Holdings(2)
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWJ and LIT overlap?
EWJ and LIT overlap by 2.0% of portfolio weight. They share 2 holdings (EWJ holds 179 positions and LIT holds 41), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWJ and LIT?
The two portfolios are 2.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWJ and LIT?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6752 and 6762. Together the top 2 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWJ own that LIT doesn't?
177 positions (97.3% of EWJ) are unique to EWJ, led by 8306, 7203 and 9984. In the other direction, 39 positions (92.2% of LIT) are unique to LIT.