EWJ vs XT: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 179 holdings · $22.4B · as of 2026-05-31
XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
iShares · 219 holdings · $3.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWJ: 2026-05-31, XT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWJ and XT?
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ, by iShares) holds 179 positions; iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT, by iShares) holds 219. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10EWJ holds 179 · XT holds 219
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWJ 9%·XT 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWJ
169 of 179 positions (90.2% of the fund) are not held by XT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWJ | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 17.7% | 42.5% |
| Industrials | 23.4% | 9.6% |
| Health Care | 5.6% | 23.2% |
| Financials | 16.3% | 4.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.2% | 7.2% |
| Other Sectors | 17.5% | 11.1% |
| Unclassified | 6.5% | 2.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (7% of EWJ, 2% of XT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWJ | +4.1% | +20.7% | +31.9% | +19.3% | +10.0% | +9.3% | 3.68% |
| XT | +1.0% | +19.3% | +36.3% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +14.1% | 6.87% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWJ vs XT →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 6981, 6723 and 6954.
2.01% | 1.31% | 1.31% | |
0.95% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.88% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.97% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.28% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
2.39% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.64% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.58% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
| JAPANESE YEN | 0.27% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWJ and XT overlap?
EWJ and XT overlap by 3.6% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (EWJ holds 179 positions and XT holds 219), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWJ and XT?
The two portfolios are 3.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWJ and XT?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6981, 6723, 6954, 4502 and 6383. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWJ own that XT doesn't?
169 positions (90.2% of EWJ) are unique to EWJ, led by 8306, 7203 and 9984. In the other direction, 209 positions (96.2% of XT) are unique to XT.