EWL vs IXJ: Holdings Overlap
EWLiShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
iShares · 42 holdings · $2.2B · as of 2026-05-31
IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EWL: 2026-05-31, IXJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWL and IXJ?
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL, by iShares) holds 42 positions; iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ, by iShares) holds 123. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10EWL holds 42 · IXJ holds 123
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWL 38%·IXJ 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWL
32 of 42 positions (60.4% of the fund) are not held by IXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWL | IXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 37.9% | 98.9% |
| Financials | 17.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 14.3% | 0.6% |
| Industrials | 11.3% | 0.0% |
| Materials | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 8.4% | 0.1% |
| Unclassified | 3.2% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of EWL, 0% of IXJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWL | +1.7% | +9.5% | +22.3% | +13.4% | +7.3% | +10.1% | 1.69% |
| IXJ | +0.7% | +5.9% | +25.5% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +8.5% | 1.41% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWL vs IXJ →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by NOVN, ROP and LONN.
 NOVNNovartis AG CHF0.49 (REGD) | 13.56% | 3.87% | 3.87% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ROPRoche Holding AG CHF0.001 | 14.03% | 3.72% | 3.72% |
 LONNLonza Group AG (Registered) | 2.35% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
 ALCAlcon AG | 1.77% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
 GALDGalderma Group AG | 2.24% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
 SDZSandoz Group AG | 1.93% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
 RORoche Holding AG | 0.39% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 STMNStraumann Holding AG (Registered) | 0.83% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 SOONSonova Holding AG (Registered) | 0.83% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Euro | 0.04% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWL and IXJ overlap?
EWL and IXJ overlap by 10.1% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (EWL holds 42 positions and IXJ holds 123), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWL and IXJ?
The two portfolios are 10.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWL and IXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are NOVN, ROP, LONN, ALC and GALD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWL own that IXJ doesn't?
32 positions (60.4% of EWL) are unique to EWL, led by NESN, ABBN and UBSG. In the other direction, 113 positions (89.5% of IXJ) are unique to IXJ.