EWQ vs EFG: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 56 holdings · $342M · as of 2026-05-31
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EWQ: 2026-05-31, EFG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWQ and EFG?
iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ, by iShares) holds 56 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383. They have 29 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 29EWQ holds 56 · EFG holds 383
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWQ 60%·EFG 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWQ
27 of 56 positions (39.5% of the fund) are not held by EFG.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWQ | EFG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 29.9% | 28.8% |
| Information Technology | 3.6% | 16.1% |
| Health Care | 7.9% | 13.3% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 10.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.1% | 8.7% |
| Other Sectors | 31.3% | 15.7% |
| Unclassified | 3.1% | 6.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of EWQ, 6% of EFG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWQ | +5.3% | +9.0% | +16.0% | +10.9% | +7.7% | +10.2% | 2.75% |
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWQ vs EFG →
Shared Holdings(29)
The top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the overlap, led by SU, MC and AI.
7.90% | 1.70% | 1.70% | |
6.24% | 1.29% | 1.29% | |
5.49% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
5.69% | 1.19% | 1.19% | |
5.80% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
4.86% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
3.30% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
2.79% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
2.71% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
2.07% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
2.13% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
2.63% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.68% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.47% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.47% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
| Euro | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
1.35% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.00% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.32% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.58% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.28% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.21% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.39% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.30% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWQ and EFG overlap?
EWQ and EFG overlap by 11.7% of portfolio weight. They share 29 holdings (EWQ holds 56 positions and EFG holds 383), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWQ and EFG?
The two portfolios are 11.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWQ and EFG?
The largest positions held by both funds are SU, MC, AI, AIR and SAF. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the total overlap.
What does EWQ own that EFG doesn't?
27 positions (39.5% of EWQ) are unique to EWQ, led by TTE, BNP and SAN. In the other direction, 354 positions (87.9% of EFG) are unique to EFG.