EWQ vs FEZ: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 56 holdings · $342M · as of 2026-05-31
FEZState Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 51 holdings · $4.5B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (EWQ: 2026-05-31, FEZ: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWQ and FEZ?
iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ, by iShares) holds 56 positions; State Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF (FEZ, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 50. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 32.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 32.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15EWQ holds 56 · FEZ holds 50
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWQ 70%·FEZ 32%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWQ
41 of 56 positions (29.9% of the fund) are not held by FEZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWQ | FEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 29.9% | 21.9% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 28.2% |
| Information Technology | 3.6% | 12.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.1% | 9.6% |
| Consumer Staples | 8.2% | 5.3% |
| Other Sectors | 31.1% | 20.1% |
| Unclassified | 3.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of EWQ, 0% of FEZ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWQ | +5.3% | +9.0% | +16.0% | +10.9% | +7.7% | +10.2% | 2.75% |
| FEZ | +4.7% | +13.6% | +24.4% | +19.4% | +11.9% | +11.5% | 2.48% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWQ vs FEZ →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the overlap, led by SU, TTE and SAF.
7.90% | 3.82% | 3.82% | |
7.99% | 3.73% | 3.73% | |
5.80% | 2.89% | 2.89% | |
5.69% | 2.75% | 2.75% | |
6.24% | 2.62% | 2.62% | |
4.97% | 2.57% | 2.57% | |
5.49% | 2.43% | 2.43% | |
4.86% | 2.07% | 2.07% | |
4.41% | 1.84% | 1.84% | |
3.54% | 1.74% | 1.74% | |
3.30% | 1.62% | 1.62% | |
2.71% | 1.26% | 1.26% | |
2.79% | 1.18% | 1.18% | |
2.11% | 0.96% | 0.96% | |
1.85% | 0.93% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWQ and FEZ overlap?
EWQ and FEZ overlap by 32.4% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (EWQ holds 56 positions and FEZ holds 50), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWQ and FEZ?
The two portfolios are 32.4% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWQ and FEZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are SU, TTE, SAF, AIR and MC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the total overlap.
What does EWQ own that FEZ doesn't?
41 positions (29.9% of EWQ) are unique to EWQ, led by GLE, ENGI and STM. In the other direction, 35 positions (65.3% of FEZ) are unique to FEZ.