EWW vs ILF: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 41 holdings · $2.0B · as of 2026-05-31
ILFiShares Latin America 40 ETF
iShares · 44 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EWW: 2026-05-31, ILF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWW and ILF?
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW, by iShares) holds 41 positions; iShares Latin America 40 ETF (ILF, by iShares) holds 44. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11EWW holds 41 · ILF holds 44
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWW 60%·ILF 24%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWW
30 of 41 positions (40.1% of the fund) are not held by ILF.
4FOIndustrias Penoles SAB de CV4.63%
GAPBGrupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico S.A.B. de C.V. COM NPV SER'B'3.72%
ASURBGrupo Aeroportuario del Sureste S.A.B. de C.V. SER'B'NPV2.35%
FIBRAPLPrologis Property Mexico SA de CV2.31%
GFINBUROGrupo Financiero Inbursa SAB de CV1.78%
- Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte S.A.B. de C.V. SER'B' NPV1.65%
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWW | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 9.6% | 36.9% |
| Materials | 23.7% | 21.4% |
| Consumer Staples | 17.5% | 9.4% |
| Energy | 0.0% | 13.0% |
| Industrials | 8.1% | 6.6% |
| Other Sectors | 15.3% | 11.0% |
| Unclassified | 25.6% | 1.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (26% of EWW, 1% of ILF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWW | +3.3% | +13.5% | +30.0% | +11.0% | +13.3% | +7.2% | 3.18% |
| ILF | +2.7% | +15.2% | +38.5% | +14.3% | +10.7% | +7.1% | 3.41% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWW vs ILF →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by GMEXICOB, GFNORTEO and AMXB.
14.27% | 5.16% | 5.16% | |
9.62% | 4.15% | 4.15% | |
8.09% | 3.56% | 3.56% | |
7.10% | 2.89% | 2.89% | |
4.86% | 2.69% | 2.69% | |
5.40% | 2.43% | 2.43% | |
2.97% | 0.88% | 0.88% | |
2.02% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
2.24% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
| Grupo Carso SAB de CV | 2.05% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
| MEXICAN NUEVO PESO | 1.14% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWW and ILF overlap?
EWW and ILF overlap by 23.8% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (EWW holds 41 positions and ILF holds 44), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWW and ILF?
The two portfolios are 23.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWW and ILF?
The largest positions held by both funds are GMEXICOB, GFNORTEO, AMXB, FEMSAUBD and CEMEXCPO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWW own that ILF doesn't?
30 positions (40.1% of EWW) are unique to EWW, led by 4FO, GAPB and ASURB. In the other direction, 33 positions (75.6% of ILF) are unique to ILF.