EWZ vs IWM: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 47 holdings · $9.2B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 1941 holdings · $82.2B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EWZ: 2026-05-31, IWM: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EWZ and IWM?
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ, by iShares) holds 47 positions; iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM, by iShares) holds 1941. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1EWZ holds 47 · IWM holds 1941
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EWZ 0%·IWM 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EWZ
46 of 47 positions (98.7% of the fund) are not held by IWM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EWZ | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 32.2% | 15.3% |
| Industrials | 4.7% | 17.9% |
| Health Care | 1.2% | 16.6% |
| Energy | 14.0% | 6.0% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 13.6% |
| Other Sectors | 23.0% | 24.8% |
| Unclassified | 23.9% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (24% of EWZ, 5% of IWM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWZ | +2.0% | +12.3% | +31.6% | +9.6% | +6.8% | +5.7% | 4.14% |
| IWM | +1.8% | +23.0% | +38.6% | +17.1% | +7.5% | +10.8% | 0.88% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EWZ vs IWM →
Shared Holdings(1)
 STNEStoneco Ltd COM USD0.000079365 CL A | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
|---|
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EWZ and IWM overlap?
EWZ and IWM overlap by 0.1% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (EWZ holds 47 positions and IWM holds 1941), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EWZ and IWM?
The two portfolios are 0.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EWZ and IWM?
The largest positions held by both funds are STNE. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EWZ own that IWM doesn't?
46 positions (98.7% of EWZ) are unique to EWZ, led by VALE3, NU and ITUB4. In the other direction, 1940 positions (99.5% of IWM) are unique to IWM.