EZU vs IQLT: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 226 holdings · $9.8B · as of 2026-05-31
IQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
iShares · 309 holdings · $14.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EZU: 2026-05-31, IQLT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EZU and IQLT?
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU, by iShares) holds 226 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT, by iShares) holds 309. They have 77 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 77EZU holds 226 · IQLT holds 309
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EZU 37%·IQLT 29%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EZU
149 of 226 positions (62.6% of the fund) are not held by IQLT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EZU | IQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 23.5% | 23.4% |
| Industrials | 19.2% | 17.3% |
| Information Technology | 15.4% | 10.8% |
| Health Care | 5.2% | 9.4% |
| Materials | 3.9% | 7.0% |
| Other Sectors | 27.2% | 26.5% |
| Unclassified | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EZU, 5% of IQLT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EZU | +4.0% | +13.7% | +23.6% | +19.3% | +10.3% | +10.8% | 2.57% |
| IQLT | +4.5% | +15.4% | +24.8% | +16.1% | +8.2% | +10.1% | 2.31% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EZU vs IQLT →
Shared Holdings(77)
The top 10 shared positions account for 59% of the overlap, led by ASML, ALV and SU.
8.09% | 6.04% | 6.04% | |
2.17% | 2.49% | 2.17% | |
2.22% | 1.54% | 1.54% | |
1.88% | 1.18% | 1.18% | |
1.75% | 0.96% | 0.96% | |
0.88% | 1.14% | 0.88% | |
0.87% | 0.91% | 0.87% | |
0.99% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
1.54% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
0.76% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.89% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
0.70% | 0.78% | 0.70% | |
1.37% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
1.18% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
0.56% | 0.61% | 0.56% | |
0.67% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.58% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.49% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.36% | 0.46% | 0.36% | |
0.63% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.32% | 0.46% | 0.32% | |
0.29% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 0.40% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.33% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EZU and IQLT overlap?
EZU and IQLT overlap by 27.2% of portfolio weight. They share 77 holdings (EZU holds 226 positions and IQLT holds 309), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EZU and IQLT?
The two portfolios are 27.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EZU and IQLT?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, ALV, SU, IBE and MC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 59% of the total overlap.
What does EZU own that IQLT doesn't?
149 positions (62.6% of EZU) are unique to EZU, led by SIE, SAP and SAN. In the other direction, 232 positions (70.7% of IQLT) are unique to IQLT.