FCOM vs IVV: Holdings Overlap
FCOMFidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
Fidelity · 89 holdings · $1.7B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FCOM: 2026-04-30, IVV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FCOM and IVV?
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM, by Fidelity) holds 89 positions; iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503. They have 22 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 22FCOM holds 89 · IVV holds 503
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FCOM 86%·IVV 10%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FCOM
67 of 89 positions (14.3% of the fund) are not held by IVV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FCOM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 99.8% | 10.5% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 32.6% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.8% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 9.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 24.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | -1.3% | -2.9% | +8.4% | +20.2% | +6.1% | +10.5% | 0.99% |
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FCOM vs IVV →
Shared Holdings(22)
The top 10 shared positions account for 96% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, GOOG and META.
16.29% | 2.99% | 2.99% | |
10.74% | 2.39% | 2.39% | |
20.39% | 2.23% | 2.23% | |
5.18% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
4.18% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
3.88% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
4.12% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
2.69% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
2.68% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
2.82% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
2.09% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
2.08% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.54% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.45% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.84% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.75% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.80% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.62% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.59% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.52% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.20% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FCOM and IVV overlap?
FCOM and IVV overlap by 10.3% of portfolio weight. They share 22 holdings (FCOM holds 89 positions and IVV holds 503), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FCOM and IVV?
The two portfolios are 10.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FCOM and IVV?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, GOOG, META, NFLX and VZ. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 96% of the total overlap.
What does FCOM own that IVV doesn't?
67 positions (14.3% of FCOM) are unique to FCOM, led by RBLX, FWONK and ASTS. In the other direction, 481 positions (89.5% of IVV) are unique to IVV.