FDIS vs IWO: Holdings Overlap
FDISFidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
Fidelity · 248 holdings · $1.7B · as of 2026-04-30
IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
iShares · 1101 holdings · $14.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FDIS: 2026-04-30, IWO: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FDIS and IWO?
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS, by Fidelity) holds 248 positions; iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO, by iShares) holds 1101. They have 74 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 74FDIS holds 248 · IWO holds 1101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FDIS 4%·IWO 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FDIS
174 of 248 positions (95.5% of the fund) are not held by IWO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWO
1027 of 1101 positions (92.8% of the fund) are not held by FDIS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FDIS | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 99.5% | 7.3% |
| Industrials | 0.3% | 23.7% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 23.1% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 19.0% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 8.6% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 14.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 4.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of FDIS, 4% of IWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDIS | +1.8% | +2.9% | +9.4% | +12.3% | +5.9% | +13.7% | 0.71% |
| IWO | +1.2% | +21.0% | +34.7% | +17.5% | +5.9% | +11.0% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FDIS vs IWO →
Shared Holdings(74)
The top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the overlap, led by EAT, IBP and FTDR.
0.13% | 0.42% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.41% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 0.26% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.30% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.11% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.25% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.26% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.13% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.23% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.21% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.10% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.28% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.27% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.25% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.28% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.10% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.17% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.16% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.17% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.16% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.19% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.11% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.09% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.09% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FDIS and IWO overlap?
FDIS and IWO overlap by 3.7% of portfolio weight. They share 74 holdings (FDIS holds 248 positions and IWO holds 1101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FDIS and IWO?
The two portfolios are 3.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FDIS and IWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are EAT, IBP, FTDR, BOOT and GPI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 29% of the total overlap.
What does FDIS own that IWO doesn't?
174 positions (95.5% of FDIS) are unique to FDIS, led by AMZN, TSLA and HD. In the other direction, 1027 positions (92.8% of IWO) are unique to IWO.