FDN vs SMH: Holdings Overlap
FDNFirst Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
First Trust · 41 holdings · $5.3B · as of 2026-03-31
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are FDN and SMH?
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN, by First Trust) holds 41 positions; VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0FDN holds 41 · SMH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FDN 0%·SMH 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FDN
41 of 41 positions (99.9% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FDN | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 38.1% | 99.9% |
| Communication Services | 29.8% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 26.9% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 2.2% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 1.4% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDN | +6.5% | +7.5% | +6.5% | +19.6% | +3.6% | +13.9% | — |
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FDN vs SMH →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FDN and SMH overlap?
FDN and SMH overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (FDN holds 41 positions and SMH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FDN and SMH?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does FDN own that SMH doesn't?
41 positions (99.9% of FDN) are unique to FDN, led by AMZN, META and NFLX. In the other direction, 25 positions (99.9% of SMH) are unique to SMH.