FEZ vs EFG: Holdings Overlap
FEZState Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 51 holdings · $4.5B · as of 2026-08-06
EFGiShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
iShares · 383 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (FEZ: 2026-08-06, EFG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FEZ and EFG?
State Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF (FEZ, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 50 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG, by iShares) holds 383. They have 26 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 24.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 24.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 26FEZ holds 50 · EFG holds 383
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FEZ 57%·EFG 25%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FEZ
24 of 51 positions (40.8% of the fund) are not held by EFG.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FEZ | EFG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 21.9% | 28.8% |
| Financials | 28.2% | 10.6% |
| Information Technology | 12.6% | 16.1% |
| Health Care | 5.1% | 13.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.6% | 8.7% |
| Other Sectors | 20.3% | 15.7% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 6.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of FEZ, 6% of EFG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEZ | +4.7% | +13.6% | +24.4% | +19.4% | +11.9% | +11.5% | 2.48% |
| EFG | +3.0% | +11.7% | +17.6% | +12.3% | +4.5% | +8.2% | 2.21% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FEZ vs EFG →
Shared Holdings(26)
The top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the overlap, led by ASML, SU and SAP.
8.78% | 5.46% | 5.46% | |
3.82% | 1.70% | 1.70% | |
3.81% | 1.70% | 1.70% | |
2.75% | 1.60% | 1.60% | |
2.62% | 1.29% | 1.29% | |
2.43% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
2.75% | 1.19% | 1.19% | |
2.89% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
2.07% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
4.41% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
1.66% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
1.62% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
1.19% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
1.44% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.15% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
1.18% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
1.26% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.10% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.03% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.94% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
2.22% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
2.81% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.65% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.65% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.38% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FEZ and EFG overlap?
FEZ and EFG overlap by 24.9% of portfolio weight. They share 26 holdings (FEZ holds 50 positions and EFG holds 383), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FEZ and EFG?
The two portfolios are 24.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FEZ and EFG?
The largest positions held by both funds are ASML, SU, SAP, ENR and MC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the total overlap.
What does FEZ own that EFG doesn't?
24 positions (40.8% of FEZ) are unique to FEZ, led by SAN, TTE and ALV. In the other direction, 357 positions (74.6% of EFG) are unique to EFG.