FEZ vs EWG: Holdings Overlap
FEZState Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 51 holdings · $4.5B · as of 2026-08-06
iShares · 55 holdings · $1.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (FEZ: 2026-08-06, EWG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FEZ and EWG?
State Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF (FEZ, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 50 positions; iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG, by iShares) holds 55. They have 16 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 16FEZ holds 50 · EWG holds 55
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FEZ 27%·EWG 70%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FEZ
34 of 51 positions (70.3% of the fund) are not held by EWG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FEZ | EWG |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 21.9% | 28.6% |
| Financials | 28.2% | 20.0% |
| Information Technology | 12.6% | 15.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.6% | 6.2% |
| Communication Services | 2.2% | 6.2% |
| Other Sectors | 23.2% | 17.7% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 5.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of FEZ, 5% of EWG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEZ | +4.7% | +13.6% | +24.4% | +19.4% | +11.9% | +11.5% | 2.48% |
| EWG | +4.7% | +5.7% | +6.1% | +18.0% | +7.5% | +8.2% | 1.89% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FEZ vs EWG →
Shared Holdings(16)
The top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the overlap, led by SIE, SAP and ALV.
4.41% | 11.97% | 4.41% | |
3.81% | 9.49% | 3.81% | |
3.69% | 8.47% | 3.69% | |
2.75% | 7.37% | 2.75% | |
2.22% | 6.21% | 2.22% | |
1.46% | 3.45% | 1.46% | |
1.38% | 2.96% | 1.38% | |
1.19% | 3.48% | 1.19% | |
1.15% | 2.75% | 1.15% | |
1.10% | 2.73% | 1.10% | |
1.07% | 2.10% | 1.07% | |
1.01% | 2.66% | 1.01% | |
0.74% | 2.20% | 0.74% | |
0.65% | 1.66% | 0.65% | |
0.43% | 1.23% | 0.43% | |
0.34% | 1.10% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FEZ and EWG overlap?
FEZ and EWG overlap by 27.4% of portfolio weight. They share 16 holdings (FEZ holds 50 positions and EWG holds 55), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FEZ and EWG?
The two portfolios are 27.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FEZ and EWG?
The largest positions held by both funds are SIE, SAP, ALV, ENR and DTE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 85% of the total overlap.
What does FEZ own that EWG doesn't?
34 positions (70.3% of FEZ) are unique to FEZ, led by ASML, SAN and SU. In the other direction, 39 positions (29.9% of EWG) are unique to EWG.