FLJP vs FNDF: Holdings Overlap
Franklin Templeton · 477 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Schwab · 888 holdings · $25.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (FLJP: 2026-03-31, FNDF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FLJP and FNDF?
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP, by Franklin Templeton) holds 477 positions; Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF, by Schwab) holds 888. They have 244 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 244FLJP holds 477 · FNDF holds 888
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FLJP 86%·FNDF 22%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FLJP
233 of 477 positions (12.9% of the fund) are not held by FNDF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FLJP | FNDF |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 21.1% | 11.4% |
| Financials | 13.7% | 15.8% |
| Information Technology | 10.9% | 12.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.9% | 7.9% |
| Energy | 0.9% | 10.0% |
| Other Sectors | 21.9% | 28.9% |
| Unclassified | 19.7% | 13.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (20% of FLJP, 13% of FNDF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLJP | +3.6% | +20.2% | +30.8% | +19.4% | +10.2% | — | 4.10% |
| FNDF | +4.2% | +22.8% | +39.1% | +23.1% | +14.5% | +12.0% | 2.97% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FLJP vs FNDF →
Shared Holdings(244)
The top 10 shared positions account for 22% of the overlap, led by 7203, 8058 and 6752.
3.90% | 0.89% | 0.89% | |
2.02% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
0.67% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.64% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
1.75% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.55% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.62% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
2.25% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.44% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.73% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.14% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.35% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
3.32% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
2.11% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.43% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
2.24% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.03% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.90% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.96% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.68% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.87% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.50% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.70% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.48% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.00% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FLJP and FNDF overlap?
FLJP and FNDF overlap by 22.1% of portfolio weight. They share 244 holdings (FLJP holds 477 positions and FNDF holds 888), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FLJP and FNDF?
The two portfolios are 22.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FLJP and FNDF?
The largest positions held by both funds are 7203, 8058, 6752, 6981 and 8031. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 22% of the total overlap.
What does FLJP own that FNDF doesn't?
233 positions (12.9% of FLJP) are unique to FLJP, led by 4661, 7936 and 6920. In the other direction, 644 positions (77.0% of FNDF) are unique to FNDF.