FLJP vs IMTM: Holdings Overlap
Franklin Templeton · 477 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FLJP: 2026-03-31, IMTM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FLJP and IMTM?
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP, by Franklin Templeton) holds 477 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313. They have 85 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 85FLJP holds 477 · IMTM holds 313
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FLJP 48%·IMTM 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FLJP
392 of 477 positions (50.6% of the fund) are not held by IMTM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FLJP | IMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 13.7% | 36.0% |
| Industrials | 21.1% | 20.2% |
| Information Technology | 10.9% | 10.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.9% | 1.9% |
| Materials | 3.2% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 19.6% | 18.3% |
| Unclassified | 19.7% | 4.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (20% of FLJP, 5% of IMTM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLJP | +3.6% | +20.2% | +30.8% | +19.4% | +10.2% | — | 4.10% |
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FLJP vs IMTM →
Shared Holdings(85)
The top 10 shared positions account for 44% of the overlap, led by 6857, 9984 and 7011.
1.70% | 1.73% | 1.70% | |
1.62% | 1.18% | 1.18% | |
1.57% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
2.25% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
1.70% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
2.11% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
1.90% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
0.77% | 0.90% | 0.77% | |
1.14% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
3.32% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
2.02% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.73% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.96% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.75% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.40% | 0.65% | 0.40% | |
0.78% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.55% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.68% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.64% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.63% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.33% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.54% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.48% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.44% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.59% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FLJP and IMTM overlap?
FLJP and IMTM overlap by 22.2% of portfolio weight. They share 85 holdings (FLJP holds 477 positions and IMTM holds 313), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FLJP and IMTM?
The two portfolios are 22.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FLJP and IMTM?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6857, 9984, 7011, 6501 and 8411. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 44% of the total overlap.
What does FLJP own that IMTM doesn't?
392 positions (50.6% of FLJP) are unique to FLJP, led by 7203, 6758 and 8766. In the other direction, 228 positions (76.7% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM.