FLJP vs IPAC: Holdings Overlap
Franklin Templeton · 477 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FLJP: 2026-03-31, IPAC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FLJP and IPAC?
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP, by Franklin Templeton) holds 477 positions; iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375. They have 476 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 64.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 64.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 476FLJP holds 477 · IPAC holds 1375
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FLJP 99%·IPAC 64%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FLJP
1 of 477 positions (0.1% of the fund) are not held by IPAC.
- Toyota Industries Corp. NPV0.08%
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FLJP | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 21.1% | 15.3% |
| Financials | 13.7% | 20.1% |
| Information Technology | 10.9% | 9.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.9% | 7.5% |
| Materials | 3.2% | 6.3% |
| Other Sectors | 19.6% | 18.9% |
| Unclassified | 19.7% | 22.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (20% of FLJP, 22% of IPAC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLJP | +3.6% | +20.2% | +30.8% | +19.4% | +10.2% | — | 4.10% |
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FLJP vs IPAC →
Shared Holdings(476)
The top 10 shared positions account for 24% of the overlap, led by 8306, 7203 and 6501.
3.32% | 2.21% | 2.21% | |
3.90% | 1.98% | 1.98% | |
2.25% | 1.59% | 1.59% | |
1.70% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
1.90% | 1.44% | 1.44% | |
2.11% | 1.41% | 1.41% | |
1.62% | 1.38% | 1.38% | |
2.24% | 1.34% | 1.34% | |
1.70% | 1.17% | 1.17% | |
2.02% | 1.12% | 1.12% | |
1.57% | 1.04% | 1.04% | |
1.75% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
1.26% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
1.20% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
1.53% | 0.92% | 0.92% | |
1.35% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
1.14% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
1.44% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
1.00% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
1.03% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
0.77% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.64% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.96% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
1.05% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.03% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
Showing the top 250 of 476 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FLJP and IPAC overlap?
FLJP and IPAC overlap by 64.0% of portfolio weight. They share 476 holdings (FLJP holds 477 positions and IPAC holds 1375), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FLJP and IPAC?
The two portfolios are 64.0% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FLJP and IPAC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 8306, 7203, 6501, 6857 and 8035. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 24% of the total overlap.
What does FLJP own that IPAC doesn't?
1 positions (0.1% of FLJP) are unique to FLJP, led by Toyota Industries Corp. NPV. In the other direction, 899 positions (35.2% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC.