FLJP vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
Franklin Templeton · 477 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-03-31
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FLJP: 2026-03-31, SCZ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FLJP and SCZ?
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP, by Franklin Templeton) holds 477 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 298 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 298FLJP holds 477 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FLJP 16%·SCZ 25%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FLJP
179 of 477 positions (83.3% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLJP | +3.6% | +20.2% | +30.8% | +19.4% | +10.2% | — | 4.10% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FLJP vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(298)
The top 10 shared positions account for 10% of the overlap, led by 5801, 4004 and 5706.
0.23% | 0.50% | 0.23% | |
0.21% | 0.44% | 0.21% | |
0.17% | 0.43% | 0.17% | |
0.15% | 0.22% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.22% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% | |
0.12% | 0.19% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.19% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.22% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.22% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.20% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.16% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.15% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.18% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.16% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.20% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.17% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.16% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.17% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.13% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.15% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.18% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.12% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.13% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.13% | 0.09% |
Showing the top 250 of 298 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FLJP and SCZ overlap?
FLJP and SCZ overlap by 15.6% of portfolio weight. They share 298 holdings (FLJP holds 477 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FLJP and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 15.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FLJP and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are 5801, 4004, 5706, 5334 and 2768. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 10% of the total overlap.
What does FLJP own that SCZ doesn't?
179 positions (83.3% of FLJP) are unique to FLJP, led by 7203, 8306 and 6501. In the other direction, 1746 positions (74.5% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.