FMAT vs IYJ: Holdings Overlap
FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Fidelity · 103 holdings · $579M · as of 2026-04-30
IYJiShares U.S. Industrials ETF
iShares · 196 holdings · $2.0B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are FMAT and IYJ?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT, by Fidelity) holds 103 positions; iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ, by iShares) holds 196. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20FMAT holds 103 · IYJ holds 196
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FMAT 28%·IYJ 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FMAT
83 of 103 positions (71.7% of the fund) are not held by IYJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FMAT | IYJ |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 99.5% | 5.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 71.0% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 18.9% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 3.9% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.3% | 0.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | +3.2% | +14.7% | +20.8% | +10.3% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.38% |
| IYJ | +2.4% | +14.0% | +19.0% | +16.9% | +9.3% | +12.7% | 0.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FMAT vs IYJ →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the overlap, led by CRH, SHW and VMC.
5.09% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
4.85% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
2.55% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
2.39% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
1.84% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.56% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.28% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.23% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.23% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.13% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.00% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.84% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.73% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.52% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.43% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.39% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.32% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.29% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.23% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.18% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FMAT and IYJ overlap?
FMAT and IYJ overlap by 5.5% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (FMAT holds 103 positions and IYJ holds 196), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FMAT and IYJ?
The two portfolios are 5.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FMAT and IYJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are CRH, SHW, VMC, MLM and DOW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the total overlap.
What does FMAT own that IYJ doesn't?
83 positions (71.7% of FMAT) are unique to FMAT, led by LIN, NEM and FCX. In the other direction, 176 positions (94.3% of IYJ) are unique to IYJ.