FMAT vs LIT: Holdings Overlap
FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Fidelity · 103 holdings · $579M · as of 2026-04-30
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are FMAT and LIT?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT, by Fidelity) holds 103 positions; Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1FMAT holds 103 · LIT holds 41
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FMAT 1%·LIT 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FMAT
102 of 103 positions (98.3% of the fund) are not held by LIT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in LIT
40 of 41 positions (93.0% of the fund) are not held by FMAT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FMAT | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 99.5% | 41.6% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 13.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Energy | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 26.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of FMAT, 26% of LIT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | +3.2% | +14.7% | +20.8% | +10.3% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.38% |
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FMAT vs LIT →
Shared Holdings(1)
 ALBAlbemarle Corp COM | 1.48% | 6.86% | 1.48% |
|---|
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FMAT and LIT overlap?
FMAT and LIT overlap by 1.5% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (FMAT holds 103 positions and LIT holds 41), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FMAT and LIT?
The two portfolios are 1.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FMAT and LIT?
The largest positions held by both funds are ALB. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does FMAT own that LIT doesn't?
102 positions (98.3% of FMAT) are unique to FMAT, led by LIN, NEM and FCX. In the other direction, 40 positions (93.0% of LIT) are unique to LIT.