FMAT vs XMHQ: Holdings Overlap
FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Fidelity · 103 holdings · $579M · as of 2026-04-30
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are FMAT and XMHQ?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT, by Fidelity) holds 103 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6FMAT holds 103 · XMHQ holds 80
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FMAT 4%·XMHQ 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FMAT
97 of 103 positions (96.1% of the fund) are not held by XMHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FMAT | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 99.5% | 6.9% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 28.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 19.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.3% | 20.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | +3.2% | +14.7% | +20.8% | +10.3% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.38% |
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FMAT vs XMHQ →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by RGLD, AA and CCK.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FMAT and XMHQ overlap?
FMAT and XMHQ overlap by 3.7% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (FMAT holds 103 positions and XMHQ holds 80), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FMAT and XMHQ?
The two portfolios are 3.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FMAT and XMHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are RGLD, AA, CCK, LPX and CBT. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does FMAT own that XMHQ doesn't?
97 positions (96.1% of FMAT) are unique to FMAT, led by LIN, NEM and FCX. In the other direction, 74 positions (93.0% of XMHQ) are unique to XMHQ.