FNDA vs IJJ: Holdings Overlap
FNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Schwab · 930 holdings · $9.4B · as of 2026-05-31
IJJiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
iShares · 301 holdings · $9.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (FNDA: 2026-05-31, IJJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDA and IJJ?
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA, by Schwab) holds 930 positions; iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ, by iShares) holds 301. They have 150 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 20.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 20.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 150FNDA holds 930 · IJJ holds 301
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDA 22%·IJJ 38%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDA
780 of 930 positions (77.5% of the fund) are not held by IJJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDA | IJJ |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 15.3% | 22.4% |
| Industrials | 20.0% | 19.0% |
| Information Technology | 15.0% | 7.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 12.4% |
| Real Estate | 8.5% | 8.2% |
| Other Sectors | 28.0% | 30.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FNDA, 0% of IJJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | +2.5% | +21.8% | +32.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | 1.09% |
| IJJ | +3.0% | +15.1% | +23.8% | +12.8% | +9.2% | +10.5% | 1.56% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDA vs IJJ →
Shared Holdings(150)
The top 10 shared positions account for 13% of the overlap, led by SAIA, LFUS and TEX.
0.32% | 0.60% | 0.32% | |
0.32% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.31% | 0.43% | 0.31% | |
0.31% | 0.68% | 0.31% | |
0.52% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.26% | 0.28% | 0.26% | |
0.28% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
| Janus Henderson Group PLC | 0.25% | 0.40% | 0.25% |
0.24% | 0.38% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.30% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.26% | 0.24% | |
0.23% | 0.25% | 0.23% | |
0.23% | 0.36% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.37% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.33% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.25% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.46% | 0.21% | |
0.21% | 0.52% | 0.21% | |
0.21% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 0.38% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.32% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.22% | 0.20% | |
0.27% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.28% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.33% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDA and IJJ overlap?
FNDA and IJJ overlap by 20.8% of portfolio weight. They share 150 holdings (FNDA holds 930 positions and IJJ holds 301), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDA and IJJ?
The two portfolios are 20.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDA and IJJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are SAIA, LFUS, TEX, ENTG and MKSI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 13% of the total overlap.
What does FNDA own that IJJ doesn't?
780 positions (77.5% of FNDA) are unique to FNDA, led by LITE, VSAT and COHR. In the other direction, 151 positions (61.4% of IJJ) are unique to IJJ.