FNDA vs IJK: Holdings Overlap
FNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Schwab · 930 holdings · $9.4B · as of 2026-05-31
IJKiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
iShares · 242 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (FNDA: 2026-05-31, IJK: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDA and IJK?
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA, by Schwab) holds 930 positions; iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK, by iShares) holds 242. They have 163 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 163FNDA holds 930 · IJK holds 242
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDA 23%·IJK 63%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDA
767 of 930 positions (76.5% of the fund) are not held by IJK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDA | IJK |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 20.0% | 31.3% |
| Information Technology | 15.0% | 17.3% |
| Financials | 15.3% | 7.2% |
| Health Care | 7.0% | 14.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 10.2% |
| Other Sectors | 29.6% | 19.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FNDA, 0% of IJK).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | +2.5% | +21.8% | +32.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | 1.09% |
| IJK | +3.1% | +21.4% | +27.9% | +15.9% | +8.4% | +11.3% | 0.52% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDA vs IJK →
Shared Holdings(163)
The top 10 shared positions account for 15% of the overlap, led by MKSI, TTMI and ENS.
0.52% | 0.67% | 0.52% | |
0.43% | 0.62% | 0.43% | |
0.38% | 0.39% | 0.38% | |
0.32% | 1.54% | 0.32% | |
0.31% | 0.44% | 0.31% | |
0.31% | 0.62% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 1.40% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 1.21% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.29% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 1.17% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 1.31% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.77% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 0.33% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 0.57% | 0.25% | |
0.25% | 0.51% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.25% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.25% | 0.24% | |
0.22% | 0.27% | 0.22% | |
0.32% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.22% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 0.43% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.38% | 0.20% | |
0.23% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.83% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDA and IJK overlap?
FNDA and IJK overlap by 22.1% of portfolio weight. They share 163 holdings (FNDA holds 930 positions and IJK holds 242), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDA and IJK?
The two portfolios are 22.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDA and IJK?
The largest positions held by both funds are MKSI, TTMI, ENS, CW and ENTG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 15% of the total overlap.
What does FNDA own that IJK doesn't?
767 positions (76.5% of FNDA) are unique to FNDA, led by LITE, VSAT and COHR. In the other direction, 79 positions (36.5% of IJK) are unique to IJK.