FNDA vs ITB: Holdings Overlap
FNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Schwab · 930 holdings · $9.4B · as of 2026-05-31
ITBiShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
iShares · 46 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (FNDA: 2026-05-31, ITB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDA and ITB?
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA, by Schwab) holds 930 positions; iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB, by iShares) holds 46. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21FNDA holds 930 · ITB holds 46
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDA 2%·ITB 17%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDA
909 of 930 positions (97.7% of the fund) are not held by ITB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDA | ITB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 73.0% |
| Industrials | 20.0% | 20.8% |
| Financials | 15.3% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 15.0% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 28.0% | 6.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FNDA, 0% of ITB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | +2.5% | +21.8% | +32.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | 1.09% |
| ITB | +1.3% | +5.4% | -1.5% | +5.3% | +8.1% | +14.1% | 0.64% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDA vs ITB →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 67% of the overlap, led by SSD, MBC and CCS.
0.17% | 1.58% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.23% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.59% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 3.30% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 1.67% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 1.53% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 1.22% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.87% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.30% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.33% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.63% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 2.44% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.21% | 0.09% | |
0.07% | 0.80% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.18% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.59% | 0.07% | |
0.05% | 0.26% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.21% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 0.11% | 0.04% | |
0.06% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.01% | 0.16% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDA and ITB overlap?
FNDA and ITB overlap by 2.0% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (FNDA holds 930 positions and ITB holds 46), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDA and ITB?
The two portfolios are 2.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDA and ITB?
The largest positions held by both funds are SSD, MBC, CCS, LII and SKY. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 67% of the total overlap.
What does FNDA own that ITB doesn't?
909 positions (97.7% of FNDA) are unique to FNDA, led by LITE, VSAT and COHR. In the other direction, 25 positions (82.6% of ITB) are unique to ITB.