FNDA vs OIH: Holdings Overlap
FNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Schwab · 930 holdings · $9.4B · as of 2026-05-31
VanEck · 25 holdings · $1.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (FNDA: 2026-05-31, OIH: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDA and OIH?
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA, by Schwab) holds 930 positions; VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14FNDA holds 930 · OIH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDA 2%·OIH 32%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDA
916 of 930 positions (97.8% of the fund) are not held by OIH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDA | OIH |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 5.8% | 99.9% |
| Industrials | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 15.3% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 15.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 30.8% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FNDA, 0% of OIH).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | +2.5% | +21.8% | +32.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | 1.09% |
| OIH | +6.0% | +36.4% | +67.5% | +6.4% | +17.5% | -2.1% | 1.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDA vs OIH →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the overlap, led by LBRT, WFRD and NBR.
0.32% | 3.54% | 0.32% | |
0.28% | 4.37% | 0.28% | |
0.26% | 0.90% | 0.26% | |
0.20% | 1.48% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 4.64% | 0.19% | |
0.12% | 2.72% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 4.01% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 1.63% | 0.10% | |
0.08% | 1.14% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 2.40% | 0.08% | |
| Expro Group Holdings NV | 0.07% | 1.05% | 0.07% |
0.06% | 2.69% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.87% | 0.06% | |
0.03% | 0.26% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDA and OIH overlap?
FNDA and OIH overlap by 1.9% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (FNDA holds 930 positions and OIH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDA and OIH?
The two portfolios are 1.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDA and OIH?
The largest positions held by both funds are LBRT, WFRD, NBR, PUMP and NE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the total overlap.
What does FNDA own that OIH doesn't?
916 positions (97.8% of FNDA) are unique to FNDA, led by LITE, VSAT and COHR. In the other direction, 11 positions (68.2% of OIH) are unique to OIH.