FNDA vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
FNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Schwab · 930 holdings · $9.4B · as of 2026-05-31
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are FNDA and ONEQ?
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA, by Schwab) holds 930 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 294 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 294FNDA holds 930 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDA 35%·ONEQ 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDA
636 of 930 positions (65.1% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDA | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 15.0% | 53.0% |
| Industrials | 20.0% | 3.1% |
| Financials | 15.3% | 2.8% |
| Communication Services | 4.3% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 12.5% |
| Other Sectors | 32.2% | 11.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FNDA, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | +2.5% | +21.8% | +32.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | 1.09% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDA vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(294)
The top 10 shared positions account for 21% of the overlap, led by APP, MPWR and DASH.
0.19% | 0.41% | 0.19% | |
0.22% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.92% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.10% | 0.40% | 0.10% | |
0.23% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.12% | 0.09% | |
0.11% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.78% | 0.09% | |
0.13% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.22% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.18% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.20% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.16% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.19% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.10% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.22% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.15% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.12% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.28% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.31% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.42% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.10% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.05% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Showing the top 250 of 294 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDA and ONEQ overlap?
FNDA and ONEQ overlap by 5.6% of portfolio weight. They share 294 holdings (FNDA holds 930 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDA and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 5.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDA and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are APP, MPWR, DASH, LITE and CRWD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 21% of the total overlap.
What does FNDA own that ONEQ doesn't?
636 positions (65.1% of FNDA) are unique to FNDA, led by COHR, COMP and FIX. In the other direction, 728 positions (92.3% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.