FNDA vs RWR: Holdings Overlap
FNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Schwab · 930 holdings · $9.4B · as of 2026-05-31
RWRState Street® SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 97 holdings · $1.9B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (FNDA: 2026-05-31, RWR: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDA and RWR?
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA, by Schwab) holds 930 positions; State Street® SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF (RWR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 97. They have 59 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 59FNDA holds 930 · RWR holds 97
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDA 7%·RWR 26%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDA
871 of 930 positions (93.1% of the fund) are not held by RWR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDA | RWR |
|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | 8.5% | 99.0% |
| Industrials | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 15.3% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 15.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 28.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FNDA, 0% of RWR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | +2.5% | +21.8% | +32.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | 1.09% |
| RWR | -0.8% | +18.6% | +23.5% | +11.8% | +4.3% | +4.9% | 3.29% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDA vs RWR →
Shared Holdings(59)
The top 10 shared positions account for 32% of the overlap, led by COLD, FRT and HR.
0.25% | 0.38% | 0.25% | |
0.25% | 0.86% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.65% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 0.86% | 0.24% | |
0.20% | 1.35% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.27% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.21% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 0.37% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 1.02% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.88% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.62% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.18% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 1.16% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.83% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.46% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.36% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.33% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.65% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.78% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.32% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.50% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.44% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.19% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.17% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.18% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDA and RWR overlap?
FNDA and RWR overlap by 6.6% of portfolio weight. They share 59 holdings (FNDA holds 930 positions and RWR holds 97), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDA and RWR?
The two portfolios are 6.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDA and RWR?
The largest positions held by both funds are COLD, FRT, HR, BRX and OHI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 32% of the total overlap.
What does FNDA own that RWR doesn't?
871 positions (93.1% of FNDA) are unique to FNDA, led by LITE, VSAT and COHR. In the other direction, 38 positions (73.0% of RWR) are unique to RWR.