FNDA vs VB: Holdings Overlap
FNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Schwab · 930 holdings · $9.4B · as of 2026-05-31
VBVanguard Small-cap Index Fund
Vanguard · 1312 holdings · $82.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (FNDA: 2026-05-31, VB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDA and VB?
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA, by Schwab) holds 930 positions; Vanguard Small-cap Index Fund (VB, by Vanguard) holds 1312. They have 651 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 36.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 36.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 651FNDA holds 930 · VB holds 1312
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDA 78%·VB 42%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDA
279 of 930 positions (21.7% of the fund) are not held by VB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDA | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 20.0% | 21.2% |
| Financials | 15.3% | 13.4% |
| Information Technology | 15.0% | 13.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 10.5% |
| Health Care | 7.0% | 11.6% |
| Other Sectors | 29.6% | 28.5% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FNDA, 1% of VB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | +2.5% | +21.8% | +32.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | 1.09% |
| VB | +2.5% | +19.5% | +29.1% | +15.9% | +8.1% | +11.3% | 1.18% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDA vs VB →
Shared Holdings(651)
The top 10 shared positions account for 8% of the overlap, led by LITE, FIX and CW.
0.92% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.41% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.32% | 0.35% | 0.32% | |
0.54% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 0.30% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.31% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.42% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.52% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.19% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.26% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.22% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.26% | 0.18% | |
0.20% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.20% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.27% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.21% | 0.17% | |
0.18% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.19% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.27% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.19% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Showing the top 250 of 651 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDA and VB overlap?
FNDA and VB overlap by 36.9% of portfolio weight. They share 651 holdings (FNDA holds 930 positions and VB holds 1312), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDA and VB?
The two portfolios are 36.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDA and VB?
The largest positions held by both funds are LITE, FIX, CW, COHR and XPO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 8% of the total overlap.
What does FNDA own that VB doesn't?
279 positions (21.7% of FNDA) are unique to FNDA, led by PARR, SCCO and TROX. In the other direction, 661 positions (57.4% of VB) are unique to VB.