FNDE vs ICLN: Holdings Overlap
FNDESchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab · 370 holdings · $9.9B · as of 2026-05-31
ICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FNDE: 2026-05-31, ICLN: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDE and ICLN?
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE, by Schwab) holds 370 positions; iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN, by iShares) holds 123. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3FNDE holds 370 · ICLN holds 123
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDE 0%·ICLN 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDE
367 of 370 positions (99.3% of the fund) are not held by ICLN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ICLN
120 of 123 positions (95.6% of the fund) are not held by FNDE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDE | ICLN |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 1.9% | 32.4% |
| Information Technology | 20.6% | 12.3% |
| Utilities | 1.4% | 19.4% |
| Financials | 18.1% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 10.8% | 1.3% |
| Other Sectors | 19.7% | 0.1% |
| Unclassified | 27.1% | 34.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (27% of FNDE, 34% of ICLN).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDE | +5.7% | +16.1% | +27.2% | +20.3% | +10.8% | +10.0% | 3.57% |
| ICLN | -5.3% | +11.7% | +34.9% | +4.0% | -3.1% | +8.9% | 1.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDE vs ICLN →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by EQTL3, JKS and ENELAM.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDE and ICLN overlap?
FNDE and ICLN overlap by 0.3% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (FNDE holds 370 positions and ICLN holds 123), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDE and ICLN?
The two portfolios are 0.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDE and ICLN?
The largest positions held by both funds are EQTL3, JKS and ENELAM. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does FNDE own that ICLN doesn't?
367 positions (99.3% of FNDE) are unique to FNDE, led by TSMWF, HNHAF and VALE3. In the other direction, 120 positions (95.6% of ICLN) are unique to ICLN.