FNDF vs VT: Holdings Overlap
FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Schwab · 888 holdings · $25.2B · as of 2026-05-31
VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Vanguard · 10033 holdings · $80.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FNDF: 2026-05-31, VT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDF and VT?
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF, by Schwab) holds 888 positions; Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (VT, by Vanguard) holds 10033. They have 873 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 873FNDF holds 888 · VT holds 10033
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDF 99%·VT 23%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDF
15 of 888 positions (0.6% of the fund) are not held by VT.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FNDF | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 25.9% |
| Financials | 15.8% | 14.5% |
| Industrials | 11.4% | 10.2% |
| Energy | 10.0% | 3.8% |
| Materials | 9.5% | 3.4% |
| Other Sectors | 27.2% | 32.3% |
| Unclassified | 13.1% | 9.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (13% of FNDF, 9% of VT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | +4.2% | +22.8% | +39.1% | +23.1% | +14.5% | +12.0% | 2.97% |
| VT | +3.2% | +15.0% | +25.3% | +20.1% | +11.1% | +12.6% | 1.54% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDF vs VT →
Shared Holdings(873)
The top 10 shared positions account for 14% of the overlap, led by 005930, 000660 and ASML.
5.51% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
1.37% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.40% | 0.50% | 0.40% | |
1.00% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.38% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.59% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.67% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
2.19% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.82% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.52% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.47% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.29% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.89% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.32% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
1.22% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.50% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.73% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.43% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.20% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.28% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.69% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.23% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.33% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.25% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.40% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
Showing the top 250 of 873 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDF and VT overlap?
FNDF and VT overlap by 22.1% of portfolio weight. They share 873 holdings (FNDF holds 888 positions and VT holds 10033), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDF and VT?
The two portfolios are 22.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDF and VT?
The largest positions held by both funds are 005930, 000660, ASML, HSBA and AZN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 14% of the total overlap.
What does FNDF own that VT doesn't?
15 positions (0.6% of FNDF) are unique to FNDF, led by TEVA, RCI and BNTX. In the other direction, 9160 positions (76.4% of VT) are unique to VT.