FTEC vs IGV: Holdings Overlap
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Fidelity · 282 holdings · $19.9B · as of 2026-04-30
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FTEC: 2026-04-30, IGV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FTEC and IGV?
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC, by Fidelity) holds 282 positions; iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112. They have 101 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 101FTEC holds 282 · IGV holds 112
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FTEC 23%·IGV 95%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FTEC
181 of 282 positions (76.5% of the fund) are not held by IGV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IGV
11 of 112 positions (5.0% of the fund) are not held by FTEC.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FTEC | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.2% | 90.6% |
| Communication Services | 0.5% | 8.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Industrials | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTEC | +6.4% | +29.3% | +41.1% | +31.8% | +19.5% | +24.4% | 0.35% |
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FTEC vs IGV →
Shared Holdings(101)
The top 10 shared positions account for 67% of the overlap, led by MSFT, PLTR and ORCL.
9.53% | 8.36% | 8.36% | |
1.40% | 8.82% | 1.40% | |
1.22% | 8.24% | 1.22% | |
0.77% | 7.40% | 0.77% | |
0.69% | 5.48% | 0.69% | |
0.55% | 4.21% | 0.55% | |
0.51% | 4.56% | 0.51% | |
0.51% | 4.75% | 0.51% | |
0.50% | 4.27% | 0.50% | |
0.45% | 3.25% | 0.45% | |
0.45% | 3.24% | 0.45% | |
0.43% | 4.38% | 0.43% | |
0.31% | 2.21% | 0.31% | |
0.27% | 2.17% | 0.27% | |
0.24% | 1.66% | 0.24% | |
0.22% | 1.67% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 1.61% | 0.21% | |
0.19% | 0.91% | 0.19% | |
0.16% | 1.08% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 1.18% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.20% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.19% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.66% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.73% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.29% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FTEC and IGV overlap?
FTEC and IGV overlap by 22.2% of portfolio weight. They share 101 holdings (FTEC holds 282 positions and IGV holds 112), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FTEC and IGV?
The two portfolios are 22.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FTEC and IGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, PLTR, ORCL, CRM and PANW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 67% of the total overlap.
What does FTEC own that IGV doesn't?
181 positions (76.5% of FTEC) are unique to FTEC, led by NVDA, AAPL and AVGO. In the other direction, 11 positions (5.0% of IGV) are unique to IGV.