GDX vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap
VanEck · 51 holdings · $23.7B · as of 2026-03-31
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are GDX and GDXJ?
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX, by VanEck) holds 51 positions; VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114. They have 38 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 34.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 34.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 38GDX holds 51 · GDXJ holds 114
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GDX 35%·GDXJ 78%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GDX
13 of 51 positions (64.8% of the fund) are not held by GDXJ.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GDX | GDXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 97.4% | 84.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.4% | 16.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of GDX, 16% of GDXJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDX | +18.6% | +4.8% | +56.3% | +47.0% | +23.7% | +12.6% | 0.70% |
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GDX vs GDXJ →
Shared Holdings(38)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by AGI, CDE and EQX.
2.56% | 7.13% | 2.56% | |
2.43% | 6.68% | 2.43% | |
1.64% | 6.64% | 1.64% | |
1.58% | 6.05% | 1.58% | |
1.57% | 2.82% | 1.57% | |
1.57% | 6.01% | 1.57% | |
1.35% | 2.41% | 1.35% | |
1.32% | 2.37% | 1.32% | |
1.26% | 2.27% | 1.26% | |
1.26% | 2.26% | 1.26% | |
1.11% | 2.00% | 1.11% | |
1.06% | 1.90% | 1.06% | |
1.02% | 1.83% | 1.02% | |
0.99% | 1.78% | 0.99% | |
0.89% | 1.59% | 0.89% | |
0.88% | 1.58% | 0.88% | |
0.88% | 1.57% | 0.88% | |
0.83% | 1.49% | 0.83% | |
0.77% | 1.38% | 0.77% | |
0.69% | 1.24% | 0.69% | |
0.69% | 1.23% | 0.69% | |
| Discovery Silver Corp | 0.65% | 1.16% | 0.65% |
0.63% | 1.14% | 0.63% | |
0.59% | 1.07% | 0.59% | |
0.59% | 1.06% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GDX and GDXJ overlap?
GDX and GDXJ overlap by 34.9% of portfolio weight. They share 38 holdings (GDX holds 51 positions and GDXJ holds 114), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GDX and GDXJ?
The two portfolios are 34.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GDX and GDXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AGI, CDE, EQX, EDV and AG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does GDX own that GDXJ doesn't?
13 positions (64.8% of GDX) are unique to GDX, led by AEM, NEM and ABX. In the other direction, 76 positions (22.5% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ.