GDX vs IYZ: Holdings Overlap
VanEck · 51 holdings · $23.7B · as of 2026-03-31
IYZiShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
iShares · 21 holdings · $1.3B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are GDX and IYZ?
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX, by VanEck) holds 51 positions; iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ, by iShares) holds 21. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0GDX holds 51 · IYZ holds 21
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GDX 0%·IYZ 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GDX
51 of 51 positions (99.7% of the fund) are not held by IYZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GDX | IYZ |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 97.4% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 61.4% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 38.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.4% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of GDX, 0% of IYZ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDX | +18.6% | +4.8% | +56.3% | +47.0% | +23.7% | +12.6% | 0.70% |
| IYZ | +7.6% | +29.6% | +46.8% | +27.9% | +7.6% | +5.2% | 1.61% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GDX vs IYZ →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GDX and IYZ overlap?
GDX and IYZ overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (GDX holds 51 positions and IYZ holds 21), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GDX and IYZ?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does GDX own that IYZ doesn't?
51 positions (99.7% of GDX) are unique to GDX, led by AEM, NEM and ABX. In the other direction, 21 positions (99.8% of IYZ) are unique to IYZ.