GDXJ vs MCHI: Holdings Overlap
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (GDXJ: 2026-03-31, MCHI: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GDXJ and MCHI?
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114 positions; iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1GDXJ holds 114 · MCHI holds 580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GDXJ 2%·MCHI 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GDXJ
113 of 114 positions (98.2% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MCHI
579 of 580 positions (99.4% of the fund) are not held by GDXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GDXJ | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 84.2% | 1.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 21.1% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 17.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 14.8% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 7.8% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 8.3% |
| Unclassified | 16.0% | 28.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (16% of GDXJ, 29% of MCHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GDXJ vs MCHI →
Shared Holdings(1)
 ZVLZhaojin Mining Industry Co Ltd | 2.00% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
|---|
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GDXJ and MCHI overlap?
GDXJ and MCHI overlap by 0.2% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (GDXJ holds 114 positions and MCHI holds 580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GDXJ and MCHI?
The two portfolios are 0.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GDXJ and MCHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are ZVL. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does GDXJ own that MCHI doesn't?
113 positions (98.2% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ, led by AGI, CDE and EQX. In the other direction, 579 positions (99.4% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI.