GDXJ vs MXI: Holdings Overlap
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
MXIiShares Global Materials ETF
iShares · 101 holdings · $349M · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are GDXJ and MXI?
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114 positions; iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI, by iShares) holds 101. They have 2 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 2GDXJ holds 114 · MXI holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GDXJ 12%·MXI 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GDXJ
112 of 114 positions (88.1% of the fund) are not held by MXI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GDXJ | MXI |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 84.2% | 99.5% |
| Real Estate | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 16.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (16% of GDXJ, 0% of MXI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
| MXI | +6.2% | +18.1% | +32.9% | +13.0% | +7.2% | +10.9% | 1.62% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GDXJ vs MXI →
Shared Holdings(2)
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GDXJ and MXI overlap?
GDXJ and MXI overlap by 1.0% of portfolio weight. They share 2 holdings (GDXJ holds 114 positions and MXI holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GDXJ and MXI?
The two portfolios are 1.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GDXJ and MXI?
The largest positions held by both funds are EVN and EDV. Together the top 2 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does GDXJ own that MXI doesn't?
112 positions (88.1% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ, led by AGI, CDE and EQX. In the other direction, 99 positions (98.7% of MXI) are unique to MXI.