GDXJ vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (GDXJ: 2026-03-31, SCZ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GDXJ and SCZ?
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20GDXJ holds 114 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GDXJ 12%·SCZ 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GDXJ
94 of 114 positions (88.3% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GDXJ vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 73% of the overlap, led by PRU, GGP and RMS.
0.96% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.07% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.24% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.89% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.72% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.77% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.82% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.70% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.72% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.68% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.52% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.21% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.54% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.40% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
| Bellevue Gold Ltd | 0.30% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| Ora Banda Mining Ltd | 0.33% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Alkane Resources Ltd | 0.24% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Kingsgate Consolidated Ltd | 0.24% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
0.31% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.15% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GDXJ and SCZ overlap?
GDXJ and SCZ overlap by 1.5% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (GDXJ holds 114 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GDXJ and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 1.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GDXJ and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are PRU, GGP, RMS, GMD and RRL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 73% of the total overlap.
What does GDXJ own that SCZ doesn't?
94 positions (88.3% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ, led by AGI, CDE and EQX. In the other direction, 2024 positions (97.8% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.