GDXJ vs VTWO: Holdings Overlap
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
VTWOVanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Vanguard · 1952 holdings · $17.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (GDXJ: 2026-03-31, VTWO: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GDXJ and VTWO?
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114 positions; Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund (VTWO, by Vanguard) holds 1952. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11GDXJ holds 114 · VTWO holds 1952
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GDXJ 12%·VTWO 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GDXJ
103 of 114 positions (87.9% of the fund) are not held by VTWO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VTWO
1941 of 1952 positions (98.3% of the fund) are not held by GDXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GDXJ | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 84.2% | 4.3% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 19.4% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 17.8% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 14.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 23.8% |
| Unclassified | 16.0% | 4.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (16% of GDXJ, 5% of VTWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
| VTWO | +1.8% | +23.1% | +38.8% | +17.3% | +7.7% | +11.0% | 1.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GDXJ vs VTWO →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by CDE, HL and SSRM.
 CDECoeur Mining Inc COM NEW | 6.68% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
|---|---|---|---|
 HLHecla Mining Company COM | 2.27% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 SSRMSSR Mining Inc COM | 1.38% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 NGNovagold Resources, Inc. COM NEW | 0.63% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 PPTAPerpetua Resources Corp COM | 0.69% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 IDRIdaho Strategic Resources COM NEW | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 DCDakota Gold Corp COM | 0.18% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 CTGOContango Silver & Gold, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| Caledonia Mining Corp PLC SHS NEW | 0.09% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 VOXRVox Royalty Corp. | 0.07% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 USAUUS Gold Corp. | 0.06% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GDXJ and VTWO overlap?
GDXJ and VTWO overlap by 1.3% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (GDXJ holds 114 positions and VTWO holds 1952), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GDXJ and VTWO?
The two portfolios are 1.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GDXJ and VTWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are CDE, HL, SSRM, NG and PPTA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does GDXJ own that VTWO doesn't?
103 positions (87.9% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ, led by AGI, EQX and EDV. In the other direction, 1941 positions (98.3% of VTWO) are unique to VTWO.