GDXJ vs XME: Holdings Overlap
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
XMEState Street® SPDR® S&P® Metals & Mining ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 39 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (GDXJ: 2026-03-31, XME: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GDXJ and XME?
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Metals & Mining ETF (XME, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 39. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7GDXJ holds 114 · XME holds 39
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GDXJ 10%·XME 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GDXJ
107 of 114 positions (90.0% of the fund) are not held by XME. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GDXJ | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 84.2% | 76.0% |
| Energy | 0.0% | 20.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 16.0% | 3.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (16% of GDXJ, 3% of XME).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
| XME | +12.9% | +11.8% | +49.0% | +31.5% | +22.7% | +16.4% | 0.32% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GDXJ vs XME →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CDE, HL and HYMC.
6.68% | 4.14% | 4.14% | |
2.27% | 4.60% | 2.27% | |
0.55% | 2.64% | 0.55% | |
0.30% | 1.30% | 0.30% | |
0.18% | 0.64% | 0.18% | |
0.12% | 0.66% | 0.12% | |
0.08% | 0.73% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GDXJ and XME overlap?
GDXJ and XME overlap by 7.6% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (GDXJ holds 114 positions and XME holds 39), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GDXJ and XME?
The two portfolios are 7.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GDXJ and XME?
The largest positions held by both funds are CDE, HL, HYMC, MUX and DC. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does GDXJ own that XME doesn't?
107 positions (90.0% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ, led by AGI, EQX and EDV. In the other direction, 32 positions (85.3% of XME) are unique to XME.