GNR vs BBCA: Holdings Overlap
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
JPMorgan · 76 holdings · $10.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (GNR: 2026-08-06, BBCA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GNR and BBCA?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94 positions; JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA, by JPMorgan) holds 76. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14GNR holds 94 · BBCA holds 76
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GNR 18%·BBCA 22%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GNR
80 of 94 positions (81.8% of the fund) are not held by BBCA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GNR | BBCA |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 57.3% | 14.6% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 36.7% |
| Energy | 32.0% | 17.5% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 8.4% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 7.5% |
| Other Sectors | 4.6% | 9.4% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 5.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of GNR, 5% of BBCA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
| BBCA | +5.0% | +14.6% | +30.6% | +22.7% | +12.8% | — | 1.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GNR vs BBCA →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the overlap, led by AEM, ABX and CNQ.
 AEMAgnico Eagle Mines Ltd. | 2.03% | 3.14% | 2.03% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ABXBarrick Mining Corp. | 1.67% | 2.19% | 1.67% |
 CNQCanadian Natural Resources Ltd. | 1.63% | 3.25% | 1.63% |
 WPMWheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 1.37% | 1.91% | 1.37% |
 SUSuncor Energy, Inc. | 1.27% | 2.74% | 1.27% |
 NTRNutrien Ltd. | 4.70% | 1.24% | 1.24% |
 FNVFranco-Nevada Corp. | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.08% |
 KKinross Gold Corp. | 0.74% | 1.21% | 0.74% |
 TECK-BTeck Resources Ltd., Class B | 0.71% | 0.88% | 0.71% |
 CCOCameco Corp. | 0.71% | 1.71% | 0.71% |
 CVECenovus Energy, Inc. | 0.66% | 1.32% | 0.66% |
 FMFirst Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.49% |
 IMOImperial Oil Ltd. | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.33% |
 IVNIvanhoe Mines Ltd., Class A | 0.15% | 0.20% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GNR and BBCA overlap?
GNR and BBCA overlap by 14.1% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (GNR holds 94 positions and BBCA holds 76), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GNR and BBCA?
The two portfolios are 14.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GNR and BBCA?
The largest positions held by both funds are AEM, ABX, CNQ, WPM and SU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the total overlap.
What does GNR own that BBCA doesn't?
80 positions (81.8% of GNR) are unique to GNR, led by BHP, XOM and SHEL. In the other direction, 62 positions (76.9% of BBCA) are unique to BBCA.