GNR vs EFV: Holdings Overlap
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
iShares · 419 holdings · $29.6B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (GNR: 2026-08-06, EFV: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GNR and EFV?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV, by iShares) holds 419. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20GNR holds 94 · EFV holds 419
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GNR 32%·EFV 11%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GNR
74 of 94 positions (67.1% of the fund) are not held by EFV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GNR | EFV |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 57.3% | 7.1% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 35.7% |
| Energy | 32.0% | 7.3% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 9.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 3.6% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 1.0% | 26.4% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 4.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of GNR, 5% of EFV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
| EFV | +5.3% | +18.3% | +32.4% | +23.4% | +14.6% | +10.7% | 4.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GNR vs EFV →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the overlap, led by SHEL, BHP and TTE.
4.37% | 2.27% | 2.27% | |
5.32% | 1.76% | 1.76% | |
3.01% | 1.62% | 1.62% | |
1.89% | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
1.74% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.97% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.73% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.11% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.52% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.56% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.56% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.52% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.56% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.75% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
2.75% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.39% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.31% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.33% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.29% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.56% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GNR and EFV overlap?
GNR and EFV overlap by 10.5% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (GNR holds 94 positions and EFV holds 419), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GNR and EFV?
The two portfolios are 10.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GNR and EFV?
The largest positions held by both funds are SHEL, BHP, TTE, BP- and GLEN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the total overlap.
What does GNR own that EFV doesn't?
74 positions (67.1% of GNR) are unique to GNR, led by NTR, XOM and NEM. In the other direction, 399 positions (88.7% of EFV) are unique to EFV.