GNR vs IEMG: Holdings Overlap
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (GNR: 2026-08-06, IEMG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GNR and IEMG?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94 positions; iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697. They have 4 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 4GNR holds 94 · IEMG holds 2697
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GNR 2%·IEMG 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GNR
90 of 94 positions (97.2% of the fund) are not held by IEMG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IEMG
2693 of 2697 positions (99.0% of the fund) are not held by GNR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GNR | IEMG |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 57.3% | 2.9% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 36.2% |
| Energy | 32.0% | 2.3% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 11.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 6.0% |
| Other Sectors | 4.6% | 10.7% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 30.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of GNR, 31% of IEMG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GNR vs IEMG →
Shared Holdings(4)
The top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by AU, 2899 and SCCO.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GNR and IEMG overlap?
GNR and IEMG overlap by 0.7% of portfolio weight. They share 4 holdings (GNR holds 94 positions and IEMG holds 2697), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GNR and IEMG?
The two portfolios are 0.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GNR and IEMG?
The largest positions held by both funds are AU, 2899, SCCO and 1378. Together the top 4 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does GNR own that IEMG doesn't?
90 positions (97.2% of GNR) are unique to GNR, led by BHP, NTR and XOM. In the other direction, 2693 positions (99.0% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG.