GNR vs IXC: Holdings Overlap
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
iShares · 60 holdings · $2.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (GNR: 2026-08-06, IXC: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GNR and IXC?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94 positions; iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC, by iShares) holds 60. They have 27 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 25.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 25.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 27GNR holds 94 · IXC holds 60
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GNR 26%·IXC 60%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GNR
67 of 94 positions (73.6% of the fund) are not held by IXC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GNR | IXC |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 32.0% | 99.6% |
| Materials | 57.3% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 1.0% | 0.2% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of GNR, 0% of IXC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
| IXC | +5.9% | +29.6% | +39.8% | +15.2% | +21.2% | +9.8% | 2.93% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GNR vs IXC →
Shared Holdings(27)
The top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the overlap, led by SHEL, TTE and CVX.
4.37% | 7.00% | 4.37% | |
3.01% | 4.96% | 3.01% | |
2.56% | 10.32% | 2.56% | |
1.89% | 3.27% | 1.89% | |
1.63% | 2.70% | 1.63% | |
1.27% | 2.09% | 1.27% | |
1.03% | 4.30% | 1.03% | |
0.97% | 1.57% | 0.97% | |
0.73% | 1.20% | 0.73% | |
0.71% | 1.26% | 0.71% | |
0.66% | 2.01% | 0.66% | |
0.66% | 0.96% | 0.66% | |
0.63% | 1.92% | 0.63% | |
0.59% | 1.95% | 0.59% | |
0.59% | 1.03% | 0.59% | |
0.56% | 0.96% | 0.56% | |
0.56% | 0.83% | 0.56% | |
0.55% | 2.04% | 0.55% | |
0.53% | 2.09% | 0.53% | |
0.44% | 1.61% | 0.44% | |
0.36% | 0.83% | 0.36% | |
0.33% | 0.52% | 0.33% | |
0.29% | 1.24% | 0.29% | |
0.26% | 1.02% | 0.26% | |
0.23% | 1.06% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GNR and IXC overlap?
GNR and IXC overlap by 25.7% of portfolio weight. They share 27 holdings (GNR holds 94 positions and IXC holds 60), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GNR and IXC?
The two portfolios are 25.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GNR and IXC?
The largest positions held by both funds are SHEL, TTE, CVX, BP- and CNQ. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the total overlap.
What does GNR own that IXC doesn't?
67 positions (73.6% of GNR) are unique to GNR, led by BHP, NTR and XOM. In the other direction, 33 positions (40.0% of IXC) are unique to IXC.