GNR vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
How similar are GNR and KOMP?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 9 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 9GNR holds 94 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GNR 12%·KOMP 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GNR
85 of 94 positions (87.2% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in KOMP
492 of 501 positions (98.1% of the fund) are not held by GNR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GNR | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 57.3% | 2.5% |
| Energy | 32.0% | 1.2% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 27.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Other Sectors | 4.6% | 12.1% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of GNR, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GNR vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(9)
The top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by NTR, MOS and DAR.
4.70% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.39% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.50% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.97% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.41% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.15% | 0.21% | 0.15% | |
1.27% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
2.73% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.30% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GNR and KOMP overlap?
GNR and KOMP overlap by 1.5% of portfolio weight. They share 9 holdings (GNR holds 94 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GNR and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 1.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GNR and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are NTR, MOS, DAR, ADM and PKX. Together the top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does GNR own that KOMP doesn't?
85 positions (87.2% of GNR) are unique to GNR, led by BHP, XOM and SHEL. In the other direction, 492 positions (98.1% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.